I don’t know why men have such high morals when it comes to sex.
We, as the male sex, think it’s ok to go out and fuck who ever we want, when ever we want and how ever often we want. Women, on the other hand, should have a higher moral and be chaste.
The same men generally do not approve of homosexuality. Why? I don’t think it is anything to do with homophobia. Men have fucked men since the ancient Greeks and even in Roman times.
No, I think some men are against homosexuality because they are jealous. Pure and simple jealousy!
If a man wants to fuck all the time and women shouldn’t do the same then they are in a bit of a quandary. They want to go out on a date with a woman and fuck her on the first night but in doing so she is devalued in his eyes.
Not my eyes! I am not a normal man and I am not writing about what judge to be right or wrong. I don’t judge because I am in no moralistic position to do so!
For a woman to be worth something to a man, she has to withhold the ‘goods’ and make him wait. But, make him wait too long and she is judged to be a prude or boring.
The line between being ‘easy’ and ‘prudish’ is literally a knife edge.
If she is ‘easy’ then some men will stick around for the sex thus stringing her along and end up cheating on her. Seeing someone who isn’t easy while taking out their sexual frustrations on the one who is.
Some men will date a girl who is difficult to get into bed just to finally get her there and then leave her once he has had his wicked way.
Why? Men want the unattainable.
When I was younger I thought a woman could get laid easily. I thought all she had to do was go into a bar, stand on a table and shout “who wants to take me home tonight?”
Alas, I came to realise it is more complicated than that because what she is doing is devaluing herself. Even if a woman is easy to get into bed, men want to put in a little effort.
If you go and stand on a street corner handing out genuine Gucci bags you will be met with a few different reactions. Some will be suspicious that you want something, some will think they are fake goods and the ones who accept them for what they are will not appreciate them because it cost them nothing.
It’s the same with casual sex. The woman advertising herself on a table will be met with suspicion. Does she had VD? Does she want to rob them? Will she cry ‘rape’? What’s the catch? There has to be a catch!
She would get a much higher success rate by casually standing at a bar and go through the motions even if only to make the most basic of emotional connections.
Men might be simple creatures but even in the animal world a hunter is suspicious about a free meal.
So, what did I mean about some men being jealous about homosexuals? Well, take a man with the morals and eagerness for casual sex and give them a range of partners who possess the same morals and eagerness for casual sex. What do you get?
A hedonistic casual sex life style where nobody thinks someone is ‘easy’ because they are all men together. It is the ultimate non-judgemental environment.
And why not? At the end of the day we should do whatever we need to do in order to make us happy and as long as nobody gets hurt who are we to judge somebody else’s life?
Sure there is a problem with HIV but heterosexuals have a problem with chlamydia, herpes, etc. Two men fucking each other might cost the NHS money by contracting HIV but so could heterosexual couples.
One of the biggest drains on the health service and tax payers in general isn’t HIV (who can be of either sex) it is unwanted pregnancies. In particular pregnancies that turn in to babies.
People’s right to enjoy their life shouldn’t be looked down on but people’s perceived right to have a child should be.
What makes me laugh with our society is that there are strict vetting practices to decide if we are fit to own a dog or a cat but not to have a child.
We have to learn and be tested on our ability to drive a car but not raise a child.
We need to take a good, long, hard look at our sex education system in the UK and stop supporting people who have children irresponsibly. Put more financial burden on the parents of the people producing the children.
You might think it is a something akin to a police state but unless people can take responsibility of themselves then maybe the state needs to force it on them.